Legal Opinion

Slingluff v. DENNIS

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1954No. Appeals, 236, 237 and 238PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

The plaintiffs, Walter U. Slingluff, his wife, Ruth L., and his son, John W., instituted actions in trespass against Jean B. Dennis to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by them in a collision of automotive vehicles allegedly caused by the defendant’s negligence. Later, but within the statutory period of limitations, the plaintiffs, by amendment averring Dennis’s agency, brought upon the record as additional defendants Dennis’s alleged principals, Austin J. Cable and the Calack Company, an Ohio corporation. Cable and the Calack Company filed separate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Kelly, Murray, Inc. v. Lansdowne Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Blumberg v. Broad Street Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Burke v. North Huntingdon TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Hargrove v. Frommeyer & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Muchow v. SCHAFFNER Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Malone v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API