Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Snitkin
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The application to vacate the decree of October 24, 1932, judicially settling the final account of the administratrix, is granted. The petitioner in this application is the administratrix of the estate of Abraham Goodman.. Goodman and the decedent here, Snitkin, were partners in the practice of law under the firm name of Snitkin & Goodman. Certain professional services were rendered by the firm to the Sinaloa Exploration and Development Company. In 1924 the partnership was dissolved and by the agreement of dissolution Goodman acquired all the assets of the firm. The terms of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MullonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In re FlanaganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- Erwin v. . LoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- In Re the Accounting of GillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of Van BokkelenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of OsnatoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of SwaabNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of KapelsohnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958