In re the Estate of Van Bokkelen
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
In this discovery proceeding the administrator of deceased seeks to recover an alleged overpayment to a creditor of this insolvent estate. Respondent creditor was not paid by the petitioning administrator or his predecessors nor from any assets within this State or under the jurisdiction of this court. The creditor received payment in the Argentine from assets located there.
Although original letters have been issued to petitioner, my colleague, Mr. Surrogate Foley, has already held that these letters are ancillary in nature as deceased was domiciled in the Argentine. (Matter of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Estate of KillanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re RecknagelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- In Re the Application for Ancillary Letters Testamentary Upon the Will of RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re McCabeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DiMauro v. PaviaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
- In re the Estate of KapelsohnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- In re the Estate of SchraderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Estate of Van BokkelenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of ZietzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950