Torstenson v. Melcher
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This was an action to recover the purchase price of a registered Hereford bull and resulting damages by reason of express and implied warranties. A jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiffs appeal, alleging an erroneous instruction on exclusion of an implied warranty, and the insufficiency of evidence to support the verdict. We affirm.
Plaintiffs, father and son, have been engaged in the registered Hereford cattle business in Pierce County since 1949. They run 60 to 70 cows on their 345-acre farm. The defendant has been in the registered Hereford cattle business since 1948 on a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ridenour v. KukerNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
- George Rose Sodding & Grading Comany, Inc. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Ruskamp v. Hog Builders, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Cook v. NordahlNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cotton v. OstroskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Scudder v. HaugNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Campbell Farms v. WaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahoney v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Piccolo-Lynam Drug Co. v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1976