Legal Opinion

Maury Rosenberg v. DVI Receivables XIV, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 8, 2016No. 14-14620PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

At issue today is whether a federal district court is obliged to follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure when trying a bankruptcy case arising under title 11 of the United States Code. In entertaining the defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) motion for judgment as a matter of law after a jury trial, the district court applied the filing deadline found in the Federal Civil Rules (no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment) and thus found the motion timely. We disagree and hold that when trying a case arising under title…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Douglas Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Circuitronix, LLC v. Shenzen Kinwong Electronic Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Corrie Burckhard v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. Sara Rosenberg v. DVI Receivables XVII LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Dudley Teel v. Deputy Sheriff Jonathan LozadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API