Legal Opinion

Brethour v. Clack

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1926No. Civil No. 2354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— This is a companion case to Clack et al. v. Brethour, ante, p. 21, 250 Pac. 253, It is an appeal by Sam Brethour, the plaintiff below, from that portion of the judgment quieting the title of defendants W. W. and Gr. H. Clack to the Noon No. 1 mining claim.

There are four assignments of error, but, as in the other appeal, only one legal issue is raised, to wit, that the evidence does not sustain the verdict and judgment. We will not restate the evidence, as it appears sufficiently in Clack et al. v. Brethour, with the exception of one matter to which we will refer later.

Plaintiff in this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Crozier v. NoriegaArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Clack v. BrethourArizona Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Mercur Mining Co. v. South Mercur Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ponton v. HouseArizona Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API