Legal Opinion

Causey v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1965No. 31825PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDDY, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend they have an easement over that portion of an alleged concrete common driveway located on the property of defendants and through this action they seek to have a mandatory injunction requiring defendants to remove a concrete dividing curb and woven wire fence which have been placed on said driveway by defendants and which plaintiffs claim are obstructing their use of said driveway. Plaintiffs seek to establish an easement by implication over the entire portion of the alleged concrete common driveway located on the property of defendants. In addition, they seek…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Bussmeyer v. JablonskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Schnider v. M. E. H. Realty Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Di Pasco v. ProsserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Foxx v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McDougall v. CastelliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Russo v. BruceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. King v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Bryant v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. DOHOGNE v. CountsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API