Legal Opinion

Randall v. Fenton Storage Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1935No. Appeal, 355PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Margaret Randall, the plaintiff, in an action in trespass for malicious prosecution recovered a judgment against Fenton Storage Company for $1,000 and issued an execution. The defendant then presented a petition to the court below asking for a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be marked satisfied and the execution quashed. In support of the prayer it was al leged that at the same time that plaintiff obtained the judgment against the defendant she obtained another judgment against Milton B. Seligman for $300; that the two judgments were entered upon verdicts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Seither v. Philad. Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Williams v. LeBarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Fox v. Northern LibertiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  5. Huddleston v. Borough of West BellevueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Wade v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Bergen v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Franklin Decorators, Inc. v. KalsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API