Mikaelian v. Palaza
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The first action is for personal injury to the minor plaintiff, hereinafter called the plaintiff. The second action is by the father of the plaintiff for consequential damages. The two actions must stand or fall together. Thibeault v. Poole, 283 Mass. 480, 485.
As to the decisive facts there is no room for substantial dispute. They are capable of brief statement. The defendants were doing the work of excavating for the foundation of a building to be erected on land alleged in the declarations to belong to one Geramanes. They had excavated with a steam shovel close to the base of a metal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Romana v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Sarna v. American Bosch Magneto Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Garland v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Theriault v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Burke v. ToothakerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Urban v. Central Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Barboza v. DecasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.