Goldsmith v. Goldsmith
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.
The defendant moves to preclude ‘ ‘ the plaintiff from giving any evidence upon the trial of this action as to matters demanded in demand #2 in defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars, the answer to which the plaintiff has totally failed to supply ”.
Demand No. 2 of the defendant’s demand states: “ 2. State whether or not any persons other than the plaintiff and defendant were present at the time of the occurrence of the transactions referred to * * * and if so, the names and addresses of said persons and the dates and places at which they were present.”
The “ transactions ” are alleged in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCready v. Island Park-Long Beach, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Goakes v. City of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Wilson & Baillie Manufacturing Co. v. DumaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- H. B. Claflin Co. v. KnappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Snitow v. Central Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bisceglie v. Bell Container Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961