Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Goldsmith

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.

The defendant moves to preclude ‘ ‘ the plaintiff from giving any evidence upon the trial of this action as to matters demanded in demand #2 in defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars, the answer to which the plaintiff has totally failed to supply ”.

Demand No. 2 of the defendant’s demand states: “ 2. State whether or not any persons other than the plaintiff and defendant were present at the time of the occurrence of the transactions referred to * * * and if so, the names and addresses of said persons and the dates and places at which they were present.”

The “ transactions ” are alleged in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCready v. Island Park-Long Beach, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Goakes v. City of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Wilson & Baillie Manufacturing Co. v. DumaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. H. B. Claflin Co. v. KnappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. Snitow v. Central Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bisceglie v. Bell Container Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API