Legal Opinion

Purolator Courier Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1980No. Appeals, Nos. 538 C.D. 1979 and 722 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Purolator Courier Corporation (petitioner) appeals here from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which approved the application of Mail Delivery (applicant) to amend its certificate of public convenience.

*379Mail Delivery is currently authorized to transport mail from post offices to business customers, and vice versa, in Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, Washington, and Westmoreland Counties. Its application sought to expand its operation to include the transportation of property, no single shipment to exceed 10 pounds in weight, between points in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Applications of L. P. Transportation, Inc. v. Matlack, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Motor Freight Express v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Radio Telephone Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Paxtowne v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. P.U.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Philboro Coach Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Process Gas Consumers Group v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API