Goldman v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.
This is an action against the defendant as indorser upon a promissory note executed by one H. Davis. The complaint avers that the defendant waived demand, notice, and protest; that he agreed to pay the note, and that the plaintiff might look to him solely for such payment. The case was tried by- the Court and a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff; from which, and from an order overruling a motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.
On the trial, the plaintiff offered evidence to prove that at the time the note was executed the defendant agreed to pay the note, or that he would see it…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Merchs. Nat'l Bank of Santa Monica v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Citizens' Bank of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hurlbut v. QuigleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. Caro & BaumOregon Supreme Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.