Legal Opinion

Quick v. Bakke, Kopp, Ballou & McFarlin, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1986No. 14825PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice..This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action for breach of contract. We reverse.

In June 1980, Chester I. Quick (appellant), a self-employed consulting engineer in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, entered into an employment agreement with Bakke, Kopp, Ballou & McFarlin, Jnc. (Bakke), a Minneapolis based engineering firm. Under this agreement, appellant merged his practice with Bakke and received an annual salary of $30,000, as well as a share in the profits or losses of the Sioux Falls office. The agreement contains no restrictions prohibiting appellant from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kindley v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kuhfeld v. KuhfeldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Tinaglia v. IttzesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Newton v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Carr v. Benike, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Endres v. EndresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Watertown v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Watertown v. DAKOTA, MN & EASTERN R. CO.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Heinert v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API