Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided March 18, 1992No. 91-502Published

1Opinion of the Court

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ______________________________________ OPINION : : No. 91-502 of : : March 18, 1992 DANIEL E. LUNGREN : Attorney General : : ANTHONY S. Da VIGO : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE MAX E. ROBINSON, COUNTY COUNSEL, COUNTY OF FRESNO, has requested an opinion on the following question: Is a two-thirds vote of the entire membership of a city council required to override an adverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hopkins v. MacCullochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Kennedy v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Dry Creek Valley Ass'n Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Sonoma Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API