Bank of America, N.A. v. Corporex Companies
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.
Much like board game enthusiasts engaged in a round of Monopoly, the participants in this litigation had one primary goal: to make money through developing property. And just as in the classic game of chance, key players in this litigation borrowed money from a bank and applied the funds toward developing real estate ventures. But there ends the similarity between the game and the financial transactions that gave rise to this case. A friendly round of Monopoly may, at worst, involve high rents (Boardwalk, in particular), unlucky dice…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C. Helm v. Allison RattermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Granite State Insurance Company v. TaylorDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025