Legal Opinion

Bank of America, N.A. v. Corporex Companies

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 15, 2015No. Civil No. 14-165-ARTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.

Much like board game enthusiasts engaged in a round of Monopoly, the participants in this litigation had one primary goal: to make money through developing property. And just as in the classic game of chance, key players in this litigation borrowed money from a bank and applied the funds toward developing real estate ventures. But there ends the similarity between the game and the financial transactions that gave rise to this case. A friendly round of Monopoly may, at worst, involve high rents (Boardwalk, in particular), unlucky dice…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C. Helm v. Allison RattermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Granite State Insurance Company v. TaylorDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API