Potts v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law. It is. contended, first, that the court erred in charging the jury that lager beer was an intoxicant; and second, that the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction. Under the decisions of this court error assigned in regard to the charge cannot be considered, as no exception was taken during the trial or on motion for new trial.
Witness Cadenhead testified that he went to Pittsburg with Puckett. On reaching town, on the invitation of Puckett, he went to defendant’s cold storage and he and Puckett…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sarlls v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Blatz v. . RohrbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Nevin v. LadueCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
- Rau v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Klare v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gourley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- In re LockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Schwulst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Shreveport Ice & Brewing Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.