Legal Opinion

Sifuentes v. Google Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 26, 2023No. 3:22-cv-03102Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID A SIFUENTES, 7 Case No. 22-cv-03102-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 DISMISS AND VACATING MOTION GOOGLE INC., HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT 10 CONFERENCE SET FOR JUNE 30, Defendant. 2023 AT 2:00 PM 11 Re: Dkt. No. 50 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff David Sifuentes initiated this action against Defendant Google, Inc. to assert 15 claims based on alleged unauthorized charges on his bill for Google Fi cell phone service. After 16 the deadline to amend as-of-right had passed, the Court granted…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API