Legal Opinion

Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Van Dusen Harrington Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1932No. 9336PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action at law brought by the Northern Pacific Railway Company against the Van Dusen Harrington Company to recover tariff charges on 103 carload ship- meats of grain over ilie line of said railway company from points west of Staples, Minn., destined to Minneapolis, Minn.

On a former appeal, this court reversed a judgment obtained by the railway company, and remanded the cause. 32 F.(2d) 466.

The plaintiff alleg-ed that a $2.25 charge on each car became applicable under rule 1 contained in the Diversion and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Davis v. CornwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. Bankers' Savings & Loan Ass'n of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Claiborne-Reno Co. v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Christensen v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  5. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API