Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1944No. 30083Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

From the allegations of the petition it is apparent that a writ of mandamus is sought from this court commanding the Industrial Commission to do the same act which the Court of Common Pleas ordered and directed to be done in an action in which the *161present relatrix was plaintiff and the commission was defendant.

The demurrer to the petition is therefore sustained, a writ of mandamus is denied and the petition is dismissed on authority of State, ex rel. Akron Coal Co., v. Board of Directors of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 136 Ohio St., 485, 26 N. E. (2d), 766, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of BotkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. CleveOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Conserv. Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API