Legal Opinion

Irving v. Diamond

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1909No. 337PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge. .Action by Wallace D. Diamond against Eliza Irving and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error. 31 Stats. U. S., c. 676, § 28; 32 Stats. IJ. S. 500, c. 1323, § 6'; Stats. Ind. Ter., c. 21, § 1820; DeGraffenried v. Iowa Land & T. Co., 20 Okla. 687.

1Opinion of the Court

DüNN, J.

This action was begun by Wallace D. Diamond against Eliza Irving, Barney Irving, John Hawkins, and Jamous Hawkins, in the United States Court for the Western District of the Indian Territory, sitting at Wewoka, and was pending at the timé Indian and Oklahoma Territories were erected into a state, and was tried in the district court of Hughes county, sitting at Holdenville. It was brought for the partition of the S. W. 1/4 of section 12, township 7 N., range 9 E., among the several parties claiming interest in it. The court in its decree found that the plaintiff owned an undivided…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wesley v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hooks v. KennardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. First Nat. Bank of Decatur, Neb. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Ned v. CountissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Reynolds v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API