Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Motylinski

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2012No. 2011-1016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Michael Motylinski of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, Attorney Registration No. 0076628, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2003. 1 On February 14, 2011, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Motylinski with professional misconduct for failing to reasonably communicate with a client and for continuing to practice law after he changed the status of his license to practice law to inactive.

{¶ 2} In accordance with BCGD Proc.Reg. 11, the parties submitted a consent-to-discipline agreement containing stipulations of fact and misconduct and a recommendation that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Motion to Permit & Authorize MotylinskiSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. GilbertOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Motylinski v. Glacial Energy VI, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API