Blankenship v. Caterpillar Global Mining, LLC
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
IRENE C. BERGER, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 33), attached exhibits, its memorandum in support (Document 34), Plaintiffs response in opposition (Document 35), attached exhibits, . and Defendant’s Reply (Document 37). After careful consideration of the parties’ written submissions and the entire record, the Court, for the reasons stated herein, finds that Defendant’s motion should be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 23, 2012, Plaintiff, Stephanie Blankenship, filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court of Raleigh…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hall v. Gestamp West Virginia, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021