Hoch v. Doughty
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WEBBER, Justice.
After jury verdict for plaintiff the defendant seasonably filed motion for judgment n. o. v. This motion was denied and defendant appeals.
On a blustery winter day in Jackman the plaintiff’s small Volkswagen was in collision with a snowplow driven by defendant. The road surface was 26 feet wide with snowbanks on either side rising to a height of 7 to 10 feet.
In accordance with familiar principles we must view the evidence with its inferences in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Crockett v. Staples, (1952) 148 Me. 55, 89 A.2d 737. The plaintiff says that she came around…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jordan v. Portland Coach Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Bragdon v. KelloggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Goldstein v. SklarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Neal v. RendallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
- Coombs v. MackleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Packard v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Poirier v. HayesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Reed Ex Rel. Reed v. RuleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. MarshallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Hixon v. MathieuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.