Legal Opinion

Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 25, 1968No. 19PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The Secretary of the Interior is responsible for maintaining our national parks, and for providing facilities and services for their public enjoyment through concessionaires or otherwise.1 In meeting this responsibility, he has contracted for petitioner to conduct guided tours of the Mall, a grassy park located in the center of the City of Washington and studded with national monuments and museums. Visitors to the Mall may board petitioner’s open "minibuses” which travel among the various points of interest at speeds under 10 miles per hour. Guides on the buses and at certain stationary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. A. P. W. Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Traynor v. TurnageSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Branch v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API