Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1993No. 92SC541PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

We granted certiorari, pursuant to C.A.R. 49(a)(1), to consider the validity of subsection 1(g) of Colorado’s harassment statute, section 18-9-111, 8B C.R.S. (1986). The El Paso County District Court affirmed the county court’s dismissal of the charge of harassment against respondent Ronald J. Smith on the ground that the statutory subsection under which he was charged was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad on its face under the state and federal constitutions. We hold that subsec tion (l)(g) is facially overbroad and therefore affirm. 1

I

On July 17, 1991, Smith was charged with harassment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HickmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. BaerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Whimbush v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Aguilar v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People ex rel. K.W.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API