Legal Opinion

Frohlich & Hager, Inc. v. Amalgamated Properties, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 12, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchimmel, J.

Defendant moves to vacate a demand for trial by jury served by plaintiffs.

The action is brought by a tenant and alleged subtenants of defendant for damage to personal property which they claim to have suffered as a result of a water leakage from the roof, gutters, rain leader and drainpipes into the premises demised to the plaintiff tenant, and occupied by it and the alleged subtenants; the leakage came from a part of' the building not under the control of plaintiffs and allegedly controlled by *128defendant. Defendant contends that a provision in the lease by which it demised the premises to the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. ChampagneSyracuse City Court · 1965
  2. Groeger v. Mifles Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Swimmer v. JanisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  4. Tilden Financial Corp. v. Malerba, Abruzzo, Downes & FrankelSuffolk County District Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API