Legal Opinion
Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. Champagne
Syracuse City Court
Decided December 27, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTony Mancuso, J.
This is a motion to remove a case from the Jury ’Calendar.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendants entered into a written contract for the furnishing of materials and the performance of labor. The plaintiff is the contractor and the defendants are homeowners and the contract being of the typical home improvement variety. The plaintiff sues for breach of said contract and the defendants ’ answer alleges that the plaintiff induced the defendants to enter into the contract, stating that certain materials and work were necessary to repair and finish off the attic and other rooms in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Klipack v. Raymar Novelties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
- R. J. Marshall, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Frohlich & Hager, Inc. v. Amalgamated Properties, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
- R. J. Marshall, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Rappaport v. Elmorton Holding Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- David v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1969
- Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. Champagne, New York County Courts1967
- David v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1968