Legal Opinion · Dissent

Worrall v. Ogden City Fire Department

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1980No. 16375Published

1Dissent

HALL, Justice:

(Dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the position adopted by the majority, as it creates, in my view, an unprecedented and unwarranted extension of the notice requirement of due process.

The constitutions of the United States 1 and the State of Utah 2 mandate that when life, liberty, or property are placed in jeopardy by reason of state action, due process must be accorded the individual or individuals to be affected by such action. The bare essentials of due process have been characterized as (1) notice of the proposed action, and (2) an opportunity to be heard on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Christiansen v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Gribble v. GribbleUtah Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API