Legal Opinion

Arum v. Miller

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 28, 2003No. CV-00-7476 (ADS)(ETB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

The pro se plaintiff Carole Arum (“Arum” or the “plaintiff’) brings this action against the defendants Richard Miller (“Miller”), Police Officer John Klesserath (“Klesserath”), Police Officer John “Wheeler (“Wheeler”), Sergeant Ralph Hoffman (“Hoffman”), Detective David M. Ohayon (“Ohayon”), the County of Nassau Police Department (the “Nassau County Police Department”) and the County of Nassau (collectively, the “defendants”) alleging that, among other things, they falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted her in violation of 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hulett v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
  2. Fiedler v. IncandelaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  3. Alcantara v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Thompson v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  5. Norton v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API