Viersen v. Bucher
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal by Sam K. Viersen and others from the judgment of the trial court based upon a jury verdict finding a mineral deed now more than 34 years old [the instrument upon which appellants depend for an undivided one-half interest in the minerals under a section of land] to have been a forgery. The appellees are Ida Bucher and her sons and daughters, the latter joined by their husbands.
The instrument in question, which we shall hereafter refer to as the Mineral Grant shows to have been executed by Anton Bucher and his wife, Ida Bucher, to N. W. Ricker for a valuable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
- Mondragon v. MondragonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Newton v. Emerson, Talcott & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Emory v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cowan v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968