Legal Opinion

Emory v. Bailey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1921No. 2911PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District in an appeal from Harris County. Emory and others sued Bailey and others for the recovery of land. The trial court excluded evidence offered by plaintiffs and directed a verdict for defendants. Plaintiffs appealed and on affirmance of .the judgment (181 S. W., 831) obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Plaintiffs in error brought an action against defendants in error to try the title to 640 acres of land in Montgomery County, being section 11, patented by the State of Texas to the Washington County Railroad Company.

Plaintiffs in error, having introduced in evidence a patent to the land from the State to the Washington County Railroad Company, or its assigns, dated April 3, 1877, offered in evidence a certified copy of a deed, dated March 7, 1862, to the land certificate on which the patent issued, from the Washington County Railroad Company to G. R. Healy, which was signed by “J. W. McDade,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Ballard v. CarmichaelTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fitzhugh v. Franco-Texas Land Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Quinlan v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Holmes v. CoryellTexas Supreme Court · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chapman v. KelloggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. NilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Texas Auto Co. v. ArbetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. Staley Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  5. Colcord v. GranzowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API