Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Schultz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1938No. 27141. Department TwoPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of Pacific county, by this action challenged the validity of the formation of public utility district No. 2 of Pacific county, on the ground that the county auditor, as clerk of the election board, failed to post notices of the special election for formation of the district and election of three utility district commissioners in each polling place in the county as required by the statute.

The trial court found that, on October 1, 1936, the county auditor posted one copy of the notice of the public utility district election on the bulletin board in the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mullen v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Rands v. Clarke CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Murphy v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Knorr v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Dutton v. TawesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Sudduth v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McCormick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State ex rel. Graham v. Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API