Legal Opinion

Emond Logan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2018No. 17-1996PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

*866 Two heads are not always better than one. Petitioner Emond Durea Logan learned as much when he received conflicting advice from his two attorneys while considering whether to accept a plea offer with a ten-year sentencing cap. His counsel of record told him it was a very good plea deal that avoided the high risks of proceeding to trial, and Logan signed the plea agreement. However, his second attorney-retained by Logan's family but not counsel of record-subsequently persuaded Logan to withdraw from the plea agreement. Ultimately, Logan accepted a second plea agreement…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Richard Clark v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Joseph Johnson v. Kevin GenoveseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Dominique Dushon Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  4. David Day, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Fabio Ochoa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API