Legal Opinion
Richard Clark v. Kevin Chappell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2019No. 14-99005PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD DEAN CLARK, No. 14-99005 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:97-cv-20618-WHA KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 16, 2019 Pasadena, California Filed September 5, 2019 Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Sandra S. Ikuta, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion 2 CLARK V. CHAPPELL SUMMARY * Habeas Corpus/Death Penalty The panel affirmed in part…
2Cases cited101 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- David Day, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Deondre Staten v. Ronald DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Fabio Ochoa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Steven Catlin v. Ronald BroomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Gerald Von Tobel v. James BenedettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.