Legal Opinion

Rutten v. Mayor of Paterson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 3, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The following are the conclusions of

Pitney, J.

The writ of certiorari herein brings under review the action of William H. Belcher, formerly mayor of Paterson, in appointing commissioners to divide the city into wards, and the proceedings taken by the commissioners thus appointed, including the report made by them in writing, by which they assumed to make such a division.

At and before the proceedings now under review Paterson was a city of the second class, and consisted of eleven wards. Its governing body is a board of aldermen, composed of two members elected from each ward. Winters v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re ClevelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  2. Cooper v. SpringerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Bennett v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Dempsey v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  5. Greenfield v. CarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Wilson v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. SteinmetzOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Pollock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API