Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Neuman & Schwiers Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1930No. 3275Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Leneoot, Judge:

I regret that I can not agree with the conclusion.' reached by the majority of the court.

Two questions are involved:

1. Is the merchandise involved a sauce within the meaning of paragraph 773, Tariff Act of 1922?

2. If not, was it classifiable under paragraph 1459 or under paragraph 24 of said act?

*4The collector classified the merchandise and assessed it for duty under that provision of said paragraph 773 reading as follows:

* * * sauces of all kinds, not specially provided for; * * * 35 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested the classification, claiming it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. O'Connor-Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Stegemann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API