United States v. Neuman & Schwiers Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Leneoot, Judge:
I regret that I can not agree with the conclusion.' reached by the majority of the court.
Two questions are involved:
1. Is the merchandise involved a sauce within the meaning of paragraph 773, Tariff Act of 1922?
2. If not, was it classifiable under paragraph 1459 or under paragraph 24 of said act?
*4The collector classified the merchandise and assessed it for duty under that provision of said paragraph 773 reading as follows:
* * * sauces of all kinds, not specially provided for; * * * 35 per centum ad valorem.
The importer protested the classification, claiming it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- O'Connor-Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Stegemann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.