Eichelberger v. Hawthorne
Court of Appeals of Maryland
AppeaXj from the Circuit Court for Washington County, in Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
A statement of some of the material facts disclosed by the record is important to a proper understanding of the questions presented by this appeal.
Daniel Domer died in 1846, leaving a will by which he devised all his real estate to his wife for life, and on her death he directed and empowered his executors to sell the same, and execute deeds therefor to the purchasers as soon as the purchase money was paid, or secured to be paid, and to distribute the proceeds equally to his three children, the issue of any child dying before distribution to have the portion their father or mother would have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McLaughlin v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Mason v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Smith v. TownshendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keplinger v. MaccubbinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Turk v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Harlan v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Schockett v. TublinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Warwick v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.