Legal Opinion

Ward v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 1990No. CA 90-47PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

Ferman and Ernestine Ward appeal from a judgment entered against them in favor of Robert and Vonda Russell, in the amount of $22,725.00 for breach of implied warranties in new housing. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in failing to give their proffered instruction on waiver of the breach. We find no error and affirm.

In June 1987, appellees purchased a newly constructed home from appellants, who were also its builders. Appellees subsequently brought this action to recover damages for faulty construction and for breach of implied warranties of fitness,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Pineview Farms, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Harvestore, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Carter v. QuickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Renfro v. Swift Eckrich, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Heartland Community Bank v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Jackson v. Swift-EckrichDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1993
  4. Voice-Tel Enterprises, Inc. v. Joba, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
  5. McGhee v. WitcherCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API