Dorris v. . Sweeney
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] We think that the first ground taken in the opinion of the learned judge before whom this action was tried at Special Term is sufficient to sustain his judgment, without regard to the second position assumed by him, or to the point upon which the case was determined at General Term. It may be that a corporationde facto was…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Dow v. Northern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
- Jermyn v. . SearingNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Capps & McCreary v. Hastings Prospecting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Greenbrier Industrial Exposition v. RodesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.