Legal Opinion

State v. Lester

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1975No. 74-50PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteeN, J.

Appellant raises two claims for posteonviction relief. The first claim is that, at the sentencing hearing, neither the court nor appellant’s court-appointed attorneys properly informed him that, because he is indigent, if he desired to appeal his case to the Court of Appeals, the court would appoint counsel under E. C. 2941.50(B). Appellant seeks herein to raise this claim upon appeal from the denial of posteonviction relief. In State v. Benton (1971), 27 Ohio St. 2d 87, we held that “A convicted indi - gent defendant may not, in a posteonviction proceeding, raise contentions that he was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. SimsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. JulianoOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. BentonOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lewis Williams, Jr. v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. MapsonOhio Supreme Court · 1982

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API