Legal Opinion

Behymer v. Kimbell-Diamond Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1967No. 8420PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Justice.

Ruth Behymer, plaintiff below, has appealed from a summary judgment dismissing her action against Kimbell-Diamond Company (hereafter referred to as Kim-bell). :

Plaintiff was in the Kimbell store to buy certain supplies for the Methodist Church. Kimbell operates a wholesale mercantile business. While plaintiff was standing in an aisle talking to the Kimbell salesman who had waited on her, another Kimbell employee placed a cart in such a position that it partly projected into the aisle and behind the plaintiff. The cart had a flat platform approximately three by five feet…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mozert v. NoedingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Agnew v. LibbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Barakos v. SpondurisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Curtis v. Schwartzman Packing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Albuquerque v. ReddingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hale v. Furr's IncorporatedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Brown v. HallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Forsyth v. JosephNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Hale v. Furr's IncorporatedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API