Behymer v. Kimbell-Diamond Company
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOBLE, Justice.
Ruth Behymer, plaintiff below, has appealed from a summary judgment dismissing her action against Kimbell-Diamond Company (hereafter referred to as Kim-bell). :
Plaintiff was in the Kimbell store to buy certain supplies for the Methodist Church. Kimbell operates a wholesale mercantile business. While plaintiff was standing in an aisle talking to the Kimbell salesman who had waited on her, another Kimbell employee placed a cart in such a position that it partly projected into the aisle and behind the plaintiff. The cart had a flat platform approximately three by five feet…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mozert v. NoedingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Agnew v. LibbyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Barakos v. SpondurisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Curtis v. Schwartzman Packing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. ReddingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Hale v. Furr's IncorporatedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Brown v. HallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Forsyth v. JosephNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hale v. Furr's IncorporatedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973