Legal Opinion

Hale v. Furr's Incorporated

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1973No. 1039PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Marie Hale slipped and fell on some pinto beans in defendant’s grocery store. She, and her husband, sued defendant for damages. The jury verdict was for plaintiffs. Defendant’s appeal presents four issues: (1) sufficiency of the evidence; (2) reference to insurance; (3) argument to the jury outside the record; and (4) excessive damages.

Sufficiency of the evidence.

Defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence by appropriate motions at the close of plaintiffs’ case and at the close of all the evidence. In considering whether the trial court properly denied these…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Olguin v. ThygesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. PaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Jackson v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Garcia v. Barber's Super Markets, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Schrib v. SeidenbergNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WelshNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Grammer v. Kohlhaas Tank & Equipment Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. City of Albuquerque v. ReddingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Tobeck v. United Nuclear-Homestake PartnersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Selgado v. Commercial Warehouse CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API