Legal Opinion

Greenman v. O'Riley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1906No. Docket No. 50PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Case by Grace Greenman, by next friend, against Miles O’Riley for seduction. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, C. J.

-Plaintiff brought this suit to obtain damages for seduction. She secured a verdict and judgment in the lower court. Defendant seeks a reversal of that judgment upon several grounds.

1. He contends that the court erred in denying his motion, made at the conclusion of - plaintiff’s case, to strike out all the testimony upon the ground that the declaration did not aver the plaintiff’s chastity. The declaration did aver that defendant seduced the plaintiff. This, as will hereafter appear in this opinion, 'was an averment that she was thereby drawn from the path of virtue. The declaration then-…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. People v. BrewerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. People v. DeForeMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Watson v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Durbin v. K-K-M Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. In Re Spinner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kralick v. ShuttleworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. O'Dell v. GoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Velthouse v. AlderinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API