Legal Opinion

Hunter v. School Committee of Cambridge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus, brought by certain teachers in the public schools of the city of Cambridge, for the benefit of themselves and of all other teachers in said schools, against the school committee, the mayor, auditor and treasurer of said city. Its main purpose is to compel the payment to the members of the teaching force of $37,818.11, raised under the provisions of Spec. St. 1919, c. 248, but unexpended by said committee. As the case comes before us on the pleadings and auditor’s report, the element of discretion is not involved, and the only question for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Boucher v. Salem Rebuilding CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Averell v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Cochran v. RoemerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Shawmut Mills v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API