Legal Opinion
Re-Kap Travel v. Crystal Mall Associates Ltd., No. 105229 (Jan. 6, 1995)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 6, 1995No. 105229Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT(#106) AND ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#108) On April 11, 1994, the plaintiff Re-Kap Travel (Re-Kap) filed a one-count complaint against the defendant Crystal Mall Associates Limited Partnership (Crystal Mall) for a refund of claimed rental overpayments. Re-Kap alleges that it is a tenant of Crystal Mall under a certain lease by virtue of two assignments thereof. The principal of Re-Kap was also the principal of the original tenant and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.