Legal Opinion
State v. Conner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 25, 1995No. 9311-2280C; CA A83139PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
The state appeals from an order that denied the admission of Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) evidence. See ORS 138.060(3). We reverse.
On November 17,1993, Officer Maddox investigated and cited defendant for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. During his investigation, he administered the HGN field sobriety test to defendant. See OAR 257-25-020(1)(a). The state moved for a pretrial hearing to determine the admissibility of testimony by Maddox concerning the results of that test.
At the hearing, the state presented evidence about Maddox’s training, his experience in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Plemel v. WalterOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. FutchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. JoehnkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. McCainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995