Lee v. Rogers
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.
The plaintiffs in this action filed a suit in equity for the purpose of cancelling certain tax bills issued by the City of Springfield, Missouri, to a sewer contractor. The sewer which was constructed was known as District Sewer No. 23 of Section 3. The record clearly shows that the sewer was constructed according to the plans, specifications and contract entered into. The court entered a decree for plaintiffs, holding that the tax bills were v.oid. The defendants are the contractor and owners of the tax bills and have appealed from that decree. •
There is but one question involved in this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Nevada ex rel. Gilfillan v. EddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. O'BrienMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- City of Springfield ex rel. Central National Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Wheeler v. City of Poplar BluffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- City of Sedalia ex rel. Sedalia National Bank v. DonohueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Koch v. NortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924