Legal Opinion

Koch v. Norton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.

We adopt the statement of appellants, defendants below, making some additions thereto:

This is a suit to enforce the lien of a special tax hill issued by the city of Joplin, a city of the second class, for the paving of Fourth Street from the alley West of Gray Avenue to Shiiferdecker Avenue. The amount of the bill is thirty-one hundred eighty-seven and 21/100 dollars ($3187.21), with interest at the rate of eight per cent (8%) per annum from Deéember 27, 1917. The judgment was for plaintiff and defendants appeal.

The petition is in the usual form. The answer alleges that there was no legal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Nevada ex rel. Gilfillan v. EddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. City of Springfield ex rel. Central National Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Smith v. City of WestportMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. GillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Cushing v. RussellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API