Legal Opinion

Greenfield v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1931No. Appeal, 193PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries and the jury found in her favor. Defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. being refused, this appeal followed. Between 7:30 and 8 o’clock on the evening of March 19, 1928, plaintiff, a woman fifty-nine years of age, entered defendant’s railroad terminal in Pittsburgh for the purpose of purchasing a ticket and boarding a train for Coraopolis. In descending the inside flight of steps leading from the street level to the station’s main waiting room, — they extended two flights down with a landing between, — and while on the second or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Coyle v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Branch v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Censor Et Ux. v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Norris v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Wade v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Cestaric v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API