Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MeGIVERIN, Chief Justice.
The main question here is what action is appropriate upon our de novo review of the report of our Grievance Commission in this attorney disciplinary proceeding involving respondent Dennis D. Peterson. We revoke respondent’s license to practice law in Iowa.
I. Background, facts and 'proceedings. Dennis D. Peterson has at various times been licensed to practice law in our courts and has maintained a law practice in Forest City.
Beginning in the early 1980s and continuing until the early 1990s, Peterson seriously mishandled several of his clients’ affairs. We briefly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. StienstraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. SheplerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Willey v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SikmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. ClaussSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. RameySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.